You NEVER SEE it wide open, because the blades arent engaged. 80mm diameter Cine rings by SIMMOD Lens and 77mm filter threads. . Whereas Contax is an F4 at 18mm, and 2.8 at 25mm. Time. I know I stopped mentioning how sharp these lenses are, but the 60mm is worth highlighting. To fix that I took the stickers off, added a thin layer of glue, put the stickers back in place and let it all dry overnight. Out of curiousity, what is the purpose of having both the 35 f2.8 and the 35-70? You can either build a $1500 set or a $10000 set and youll always impress with the results. Theres a lot of discussion whether the 135mm f/2.0 has a clear advantage over the f/2.8, especially when you take into account the price difference. See the photo below! Thank you to Tito for a captivating read. The Contax 25mm 2.8 is good, but you may want to consider the 28mm 2.8 which is cheaper, and "technically" better. Whenever I started thinking the Soviet lenses were sharp, Id pop one of the Contax on the camera and stare in awe. 2023 All rights reserved. I took this question to Instagram again and got really good arguments for both sides. If you are not great at DIY, make sure to check out our sponsors SimmodLens and FollowFocusGears.com for pretty much all the mods mentioned in the article above. Collapse. The issue that came up from was the stickers were having a hard time sticking to the material of the lens caps and were peeling off on their own. Each page with eight stickers cost me about $10. I still dont know when to use them, though! Sony Information & communications technology Technology . This is an endeavor Ive been working on and off for the last two years and now I can see the finish line. I was just ahead of the game, so it wasnt necessary on my case. If you do have a printer, I made a tutorial on how to make focus gears! It also has built-in color filters which I freaked out when I realized how to turn them. The 135mm f/2.8 was a great lens. Focal length marked on the rear caps as well. Reduserforum "Contax Survival Guide" says is a good one. Then, near the end of last year I decided to round out the set and make it suitable for renting. Shervin, thank you so much for posting those R3ds. On my set some were MMJ, others AEG. If you're reeeaaaally on a budget and don't mind a very low contrast look, Zeiss Jena's are a guilty pleasure of mine. But at F2 and 2.8you def notice it if you have a very busy frame with lots of bokeh. Learned a ton. WOW! I managed to get a bunch of black C/Y adapters, step up rings, and some lens gears from eBay and decently cobbled together a set. Its regarded as one of the best 21mm ever made, and to this day they still use the same formula for the 21mm f/2.8 ZF/ZE primes. Regards. If thats your deal, then you will love Leica Rs. Zeiss AE lens information brochure, "The Finest Optics by Zeiss", In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. All of you, thank you. First I measured the slip-on caps I got from SIMMOD and created a Photoshop template with that size. Wake the fuck up. One thing that the push-pull nature of the zooms helps with, is snap-zooms. By the 1960s, competition from the Japanese led to the eventual shuttering of both subsidiaries - even as the larger Zeisss stayed in business. I dont want to get into a German war over which is better, Leica R or Contax. To summarize, yeahthey look remarkably similar. In fact, they MOD better than ZF/ZEs believe it or not. B) They share very similar designs as the ZF/ZE/CP2 lenses, but for or the price Easy to see which one I loved the most back in 2015. I started using these lenses casually. Time. All times are GMT-8. The 135mm f/2.8 was a great lens. AgThunderbird A7Riii | A7ii infrared mod | Minolta 7 . For that reason I had to make a super tall focus gear that would not slip off when travelling from infinity to minimum focus. Page of 321. The one main difference I can see isas stated aboveI think the Contaxes cinemod slightly BETTER than ZF/ZEs (because they ALL focus the right way, and ALL have an aperture ring), and also ALL they have that wonderful older T* coating that I believe looks better on digital than the newer T* coating (renders more organically). Its history criss-crosses wars, politics, and conjures up the never-ending battles between Leica and Zeiss. All times are GMT-8. Would love to check out the Hollywood, but $$. thanks Nick im building Contax set in soon :). If I know Im not gonna need either the 15 and the 60, I just dont take their case with me. My favorite lens switched to the 85/1.4 after that, though. Building this set was a great experience throughout. This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. The last decision I had to make was between the 18mm f/4 and the 15mm f/3.5. I met amazing businesses with folks that really know how to deal with their customers, I did try out mindblowing glass and I was humbled by all the feedback I got when asking questions about what would be my best options in the middle of the process and posting updates of what I was working on. AE vs MM? The rubber grip on the focus ring of the lenses is awesome because it prevents the gears from sliding, but its also a pain because it makes the fitting a lot harder. Of course, that was way before RED and Leitax adapters. I'm thinking about a Contax tele, such as the 180/2.8 Sonnar. However, I wont argue that having a lens that says Made In West Germany is wicked cool. Its a very charming (or annoying, depending on your POV) design to the aperture blades that looks like a crooked ninja throwing star. Blackmagic Forum View topic - CONTAX Zeiss lenses | BMPCC 6K To fit the barrel of the lens, use a caliper and be precise about it. Contax Zeiss 60mm f/2.8 Macro AEG: Infinity focus on the left, minimum focus on the right I know I stopped mentioning how sharp these lenses are, but the 60mm is worth highlighting. My MM 18 f4, 21 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.4, 50 1.7, 85 1.4, 135 2.8, 180 2.8, and 300 F4 are all W/OUT the Ninja-star. Here are some things I got from it: Contax Zeiss lenses were designed for 35mm full frame, which means theyll cover all the way up to Vistavision sensors on modern cameras and anything smaller. Impressive performance and also the fastest 35mm I ever owned. The original CONTAX RTS was introduced in ,highly advanced electronic SLR system camera developed by mutual cooperation of Carl Zeiss, West Germany, and Yashica, Japan. C) They have the older Zeiss T* coating that we also find on Hasselblads, Super Speeds and Standardsand as such have a more organic rendering on digital than ZF/ZE/CP2s. Used it today on my 5D to keep things lightweight. In mint condition, comes with lens hood. Old against New: Zeiss 2.8/28 vs Sony FE 2/28 vs Minolta MC 2/28 If I have a motor on the iris, itll have to be adjusted every time the lens is swapped. If you dont have a 3d-printer, Im selling all the gears I made for my set on eBay! There are MMG lenses out there I was weary of that for quite a while, since its not mentioned clearly anywhere. Both look awesome, and I think people are splitting hairs. People (me included) didn't like the poor performance of the Canon EF wide lenses and the 21mm and 28mm 2.8 Contax lenses filled the gap. But then work started picking up and I saw that as the perfect opportunity to upgrade. Expect there to be bidding wars on eBay now, the gates of CONTAX HELL have been unleashed. The screws on the back of the lenses are tiny, and if you strip them, you cant get the new mount into place. In terms of a look, weve shot with both and there is a clear difference to me. Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* (C/Y) 35-70mm f3.4: A review I met amazing businesses with folks that really know how to deal with their customers, I did try out mindblowing glass and I was humbled by all the feedback I got when asking questions about what would be my best options in the middle of the process and posting updates of what I was working on. I already talked about the mount replacements and focus gears, so Im left with standard fronts and de-clicking. Im selling all the gears I made for my set on eBay, I made a tutorial on how to make focus gears, the same formula for the 21mm f/2.8 ZF/ZE primes, I was warned by my followers on Instagram about the edge the AE had over the MM, he can provide caps with stickers already on them, see here, by Moritz Schierenbeck on VLFVs facebook group. That said, many still photographers (and DPs) have gotten magic out of these lenses at an F2 or faster. RED V-RAPTOR 8K VV Lab Test: Rolling Shutter, Dynamic Range and Latitude plus Video! I plugged in the focal length in white so theyre easy to read in dark sets. So all you do is get a Cine Ring with the rear thread of your lens and thats gonna make it standard! The Soviets were good enough for my own projects, but I needed something more reliable on this one. I returned to the guide and started eBay hunting. The downside of such magnification is that the focus ring travels a lot, pretty much doubling the physical length of the lens. For a while I didnt understand the need for 80mm fronts, so Ill share what I learned so others wont live too long unknowing like me! To check if I did it, just follow me on Instagram as I post all my lens experiments there! Is the Distagon 21mm the same glass as they use in the Compact Primes? :) Thanks buddy. I prefer the FOV of a 25, but for the budget.the 28mm is amazing. That would be asking a lot of these budget lenses. This is a sticky topic. So where Contax wins in coverage (they are FULL FRAME, and will cover Dragon and beyond), they lose out in speed (they are F4 at 18mm! Slowly I fell in love with them. The 60/2.8 AE can do 1:1 magnification, while the MM can only reach 1:2. Besides Leica Rs, also give Nikkors (obviously), Canon FDs, and Minolta Rokkors a good look. These are creative tools, use them as such. Contax/Yashica Lenses - Which are the best? - FM Forums
Scales Of Justice Oxford, Articles C